Why do we have to be restricted to your ideas?
I see the carefully formed questions but why can't we contribute our freely held thoughts? Why do we have to be constrained by the ideas of whoever is running this discussion?
Here's a thought: shall we let people speak in an unrestricted forum? Radical, I realise. Gosh - imagine intelligent, educated people actually contributing to a liberal democracy! We can't allow that?
There might be some things which don't suit the tax avoiding Trust industry (shall we try to think of legitimate reason to have an offshore trust industry.... thinking...thinking...nope - no reason) or Dandara or Lyndon "fingers" Farnham - but should that just constrict the discussion?
hmmm... this is a bit old load of greeenwashing. Try harder
Why the contribution is important
Because democratic decision isn't corralled I to convenient buckets
by Willy99 on February 19, 2021 at 09:42PM